LEGISLATIVE BULLETIN – March 11, 2005

          According to fuel prices and fuel efficiency numbers from BNSF’s financial reports, the fuel surcharge on some grain movements from North Dakota is five or six or seven times as much as the railroad is incurring in additional fuel expense.  On one randomly-chosen example of a ND wheat shuttle train to Portland, Oregon the surcharge is three times the increased cost of fuel, which means an overcharge of $27,000 per train.  CP has a lesser surcharge.  When BNSF was 9%, CP was 5.5%.   Both railroads have testified to the North Dakota legislature that they don’t make any money on fuel surcharges. 

            It isn’t difficult to figure out on your own grain shipments.  Here are some numbers you will need.  The last time BNSF had a zero percent fuel surcharge was in June and July 2002.  Their reported fuel price then was 73.5 cents per gallon.   When the fuel charge was 9% this past December and January they were using a 4th qtr 2004 fuel cost of $1.14 per gallon, latest available. 

 

            Railroads measure fuel efficiency in Gross Ton Miles (GTM) per gallon.  A GTM is one ton of equipment or freight moved one mile.  A loaded 268,000 lb. car (134 tons) moved 100 miles is 134 X 100 = 13,400 GTM.  BNSF reports an average efficency of 761 GTM per gallon of fuel in 2004.  At http://www.bnsf.com/bnsf.sph/RailMiles you can put in the name of two locations on the BNSF and after two clicks the miles between the two comes up.   Keep in mind that the 761 is an average.  Like mileage on your car, it can vary by trip.  The locations in the examples below are very similar to actual locations, but are disguised slightly in miles and rate.

            A 26-car train of wheat moves 260 miles from Graintowneast, ND to Minneapolis, MN.  One 200-ton locomotive is used in this example. 

26 cars X 31.5 tons per car  = 819 tons of empty cars
                                              + 200 tons locomotive
                                               1019 tons empty train weight

1019 tons X 520 miles round trip =                        529,880 Gross Ton Miles

102.5 tons wheat per car X 26 cars X 260 miles =  692,900  GTM
                                                                              1,222,780 GTM

1,222,780 divided by 761 GTM per gallon = 1607 gallons fuel used 

1607 gallons X  $1.14 per gallon  =  $1832 cost of fuel 4th qtr 2004
Rate is $1968 per car X 26 cars  =  $51,168 freight

$51,168 freight X 9% fuel surcharge  =  $4605 surcharge

That’s a really good deal for the railroad, but it gets even better.

1607 gallons X $0.735 = fuel cost $1181 in June 02.  

The $1832 today minus $1181 means actual increase in fuel cost of $651.

But the surcharge, supposedly to cover increased cost, is $4605, over seven times increased cost.

NOW LET’S DO A 110-CAR SHUTTLE OF WHEAT WESTBOUND – Remember that the empty cars weigh about the same, but carry more, and three locomotives are used in this example.

A 110-car shuttle of wheat moves 1295 miles from Graintownwest, ND to Portland, OR.

110 cars X 31.5 tons per car  = 3465 tons of empty cars
                                                + 600 tons locomotives (3)
                                                 4065 tons empty train weight

4065 tons X 2590 miles round trip =                            10,528,350 Gross Ton Miles

111.5 tons wheat per car X 110 cars X 1295 miles =   15,883,175  GTM
                                                                                      26,411,525 GTM


26,411,525 divided by 761 GTM per gallon = 34,706 gallons fuel used 

34,706 gallons X  $1.14 per gallon  =  $39,565 cost of fuel 4th qtr 2004
Rate is $4197 per car X 110 cars  =      $461,670 freight

$461,670 freight X 9% fuel surcharge  =  $41,550 surcharge

The 34,706 gallons X $0.735 = fuel cost $25,509 in June 02.  

The $39,565 today minus $25,509 means actual increase in fuel cost of $14,056.

But the surcharge, supposedly to cover increased cost, is $41,550, almost three times increased fuel cost and an overcharge of $27,494.

If this makes you see red, then there are several people you should tell that to:
Kevin Kaufman, BNSF Ag Products VP            email:            Kevin.Kaufman@bnsf.com
Surface Transportation Board

            Chmn Roger Nober                               email:            noberr@stb.dot.gov
            V.Chmn Douglas Buttrey                        email:            buttreyd@stb.dot.gov
            Commissioner Francis Mulvey                email:             mulveyf@stb.dot.gov
Copy to Senator Dorgan’s office                        email:            Daphna_Peled@dorgan.senate.gov
Copy to Senator Conrad’s office                        email:            sarah_kuehl@budget.senate.gov
Copy to Congressman Pomeroy                         email:            Melanie.Rhinehart@mail.house.gov
Copy to ND Governor’s office                           email:            lgaebe@state.nd.us
Copy to ND PSC                                              email:            tclark@state.nd.us
Copy to NDGDA                                              email:            sstrege@ndgda.org

Remember that your disgust is not with our elected leaders.          

Railroads have known for many months that their method of calculating fuel surcharges has little to do with their increased costs on specific movements.  We are told it is “a complex issue”, that assessing the surcharge as a percentage of the rate is the easiest for the railroad, and that they are working on resolution of the problem.   If this was not running in the railroad’s favor the problem would be fixed overnight.  It is time to tell the railroad we’ve had enough, and involve elected and appointed officials in the state and at the national level.  This simply can’t go on.  With oil prices predicted to jump to $70 per barrel or more, the exploitation of grain shippers will only get worse.

The state legislative bill dealing with fuel surcharges, HB 1370, is in the hands of the Senate Transportation Committee.  The railroads have said the state has no jurisdiction, that it is preempted by federal law.  If the state passes a law the railroads might challenge it.  Imagine that, challenging a law so they can go on with this.

If anyone disputes the accuracy of the numbers in this fax, please ask for that person’s version.